Search for: "S. R. V."
Results 1 - 20
of 125,310
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2009, 1:31 am
R v T; R v B; R v C; R v H [2009] EWCA Crim 1035; [2009] WLR (D) 19 “A criminal trial without a jury did not contravene a defendant's right to a fair trial where there was a real danger of jury tampering and proposed measures to prevent such interference did not sufficiently address [...] [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 2:59 am
R v Foster; R v Newman; R v Kempster; R v Birmingham [2007] EWCA Crim 2869 “Where the defendant admitted a lesser or different crime from that charged in the indictment it did not necessarily follow that the trial judge was obliged to leave the alternative verdict for a jury's consideration; sometimes it would be appropriate, but sometimes it would not. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 8:52 am
The post Case Previews: R v O’Brien, R (T & Anor) v SSHD & Anor, and R v Mackle (Nos. 1, 2 and 3), and R v McLaughlin appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 2:24 am
R v G; R v J [2009] UKHL 13; [2009] WLR (D) 80 “To rely on the defence in s 58(3) of the Terrorism Act 2000 a defendant had to show an objectively ‘reasonable excuse’ for his action or possession and a ruling that neither a desire to ‘wind up’ prison officers nor mental illness could [...] [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 2:18 am
R v JTB (on appeal from R v T) [2009] UKHL 20; [2009] WLR(D) 140 “S 34 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 abolished the defence as well as the presumption of doli incapax. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 9:21 am
R v S (F) and A(S); [2008] WLR (D) 313 “The key or password to an encrypted computer file was a fact which did not constitute an admission of guilt. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:06 am
: The SCC's decision in R v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 9:35 am
R (Baiai and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Nos 1 and 2); R (Bigoku and another) v Same; R (Tilki) v Same (Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants and another intervening) [2008] UKHL 53; [2008] WLR (D) 272 “The statutory scheme requiring the Secretary of State's permission for marriage by people who were subject to immigration control or were illegal entrants was disproportionate and infringed… [read post]
17 May 2007, 4:50 am
R; Regina v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 3:14 am
From American Songwriter: Before we had Gwen Stefani teaching us how to spell “b-a-n-a-n-a-s” in “Hollaback Girl,” there was Tammy Wynette spelling out the pains of “D-I-V-O-R-C-E. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 3:24 am
R v Downer [2009] EWCA Crim 1361; [2009] WLR (D) 233 “The offence of aggravated burglary under s 10 (1) of the Theft Act 1968 was not to be regarded as an indivisible offence and, in order to find out what constituted a burglary, it was essential to have regard to the two types of burglary [...] [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 3:12 am
R v Kousar [2008]; [2009] WLR (D) 16 “A wife who shared the matrimonial home with her husband, whom she knew was storing merchandise from his business at home, but acquiesced in it being there and did not demand he remove it, was not in control or possession of the goods within the meaning of s [...] [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 1:59 am
R v Greene “Where a judge ruled that a witness could be treated as a hostile in examination at trial within the meaning of s 3 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1865 by the party calling him, but that witness did not in the event prove to be hostile, the judge was still obliged to warn [...] [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:40 am
The post Case Comment: R (Nicklinson & Anor) v Ministry of Justice; R (AM) v DPP [2014] UKSC 38 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 11:34 am
MORRIS v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 2:25 am
R (BA (Nigeria)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (PE (Cameroon)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWCA Civ 119; [2009] WLR (D) 77 “A right of appeal against the Home Office's refusal to revoke a deportation order was exercisable from within the United Kingdom. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 2:29 am
The post Case Comment: R v Ahmad & Another; R v Fields & Others [2014] UKSC 36 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 2:00 am
Alice Diver (QUB), Belinda Schwehr (CASCAIDr), The Significance of R(BG and Anor) v Suffolk CC (2021): Meeting ‘Eligible Need[s]’ in Social Care? [read post]
21 May 2008, 12:38 am
R v Bassett; [2008] WLR (D) 157 “For an offence of voyeurism to be committed, within the definition in s 67 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003, there had to be a private act which involved parts of the body for which people would normally expect privacy, as defined by s 68(1). [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 1:37 am
R v Geary [2010] WLR (D) 228 “The offence under s 328(1) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 of entering into or becoming concerned in an arrangement which a person knew or suspected facilitated the acquisition, retention, use or control of criminal property by or on behalf of another person, applied to property which was criminal at the time when the arrangement attached to it, and did not extend to property which was originally legitimate but became criminal only as… [read post]
